![]() 05/02/2016 at 11:04 • Filed to: Mini-Rant, Rant, Quick Rant, Ferrari, Ford | ![]() | ![]() |
Do you honestly think Ferrari would have been better off with Ford in the 60's? Yes, I know, pride and spinning and such, but I cringe at the thought of a now where Ferrari doesn’t look like what it is now.
![]() 05/02/2016 at 11:08 |
|
Probably not, since we also wouldn’t have had a GT40 then. And ferrari is doing just fine, as long as you ignore Sergio.
![]() 05/02/2016 at 11:10 |
|
Worst case scenario: Ferrari wouldn’t exist any more. Best case: It would have been sold off at some point, likely to Chinese investors.
![]() 05/02/2016 at 11:12 |
|
Better question is would ford have been better with Ferrari, because ford only wanted it for racing and imagine what the mustang or ford coupe would of been today
![]() 05/02/2016 at 11:17 |
|
“I cringe at the thought of a now where Ferrari doesn’t look like what it is now.”
Really? After making some “stunners” like the fugly California, or the fugly FF/GTC4Lusso, or the F12 Berlinneta?
![]() 05/02/2016 at 11:28 |
|
Hey, they aren’t fugly! They have striking lines, daring designs, and a stylistic uniqueness that is unbridled to conceptional concerns of beauty through contemporizing classical cues! Fugly by design/intention is simply Avant Garde!
![]() 05/02/2016 at 11:39 |
|
Exactly, Chrysler used to own Lamborghini, and it is now owned by VW, and I would say it had little influence on Lamborghini for better or worst. Granted Ford in the 60's was a lot different than Chrysler in the 80's and 90's.
![]() 05/02/2016 at 23:07 |
|
but would ford of still supported cosworth and all their crazy engines for F1 and other racing series?